Genetic Parameters of Pork Quality Traits
Dr.
Rodney Goodwin
National Pork Board
The goal of swine breeders
must be to produce wholesome, lean, tasty pork for consumers. Breeders have traditionally selected
seedstock for production efficiency traits such as growth, carcass backfat,
number of pigs weaned per litter and loin muscle area and ignored meat quality
characteristics that may be genetically correlated.
Traits of ham
and loin meat quality, nutritional composition and eating quality were included
with growth and carcass traits in this evaluation. The growth and carcass traits evaluated are leg soundness score,
average daily gain, dressing percentage, carcass loin (longissimus dorsi)
muscle area at tenth rib, carcass off midline backfat at tenth rib, carcass
midline backfat at last rib, carcass midline backfat at last lumbar, inside ham
muscle (semimembranosus) weight, outside ham muscle (biceps femoris and
semitendinosis) weight, knuckle muscle group (quadriceps group) weight, and
carcass length.
Meat quality,
composition, and eating quality traits of the longissimus dorsi taken from the
tenth to twelfth rib section are marbling score, color score, firmness score,
Minolta L reflectance, ultimate pH, protein solubility, pigment, tenderness,
juiciness, chewiness, flavor, Instron tenderness, cooking loss, cooked moisture
content, raw and cooked total lipid percent, raw and cooked cholesterol
content, myoglobin content and seven fatty acids (myristic, palmitic,
palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic and arachidonic).
Inside ham, outside ham and
ham knuckle traits of Minolta L reflectance, drip loss, Hunter L color score,
ultimate pH, cooking yield, cooked ham Hunter L color score, and cooked ham
slice yield were evaluated.
The effects and
interactions of eight breeds, two sexes (barrow and gilt) and two HAL genotypes
(NN, Nn) are reported for all traits.
All test pigs were evaluated for HAL-1843 genotype and the 1999-2001
test pigs have also been evaluated for Rendement Napole, H-FABP and A-FABP
genotype. A tissue sample from each test pig has been frozen to supply DNA for
evaluation of new gene markers.
Heritabilities,
economic values and genetic correlations among these traits give swine breeders
a guide to weighting traits for a selection goal.
The National
Barrow Show is a trademarked event of Hormel Foods Inc. The Co-sponsor of this
event is the National Association of Swine Registries (NASR), which represents
eight purebred swine registries. In 1991 a Sire Progeny Test was added to the
annual breeding stock shows and sales. This test is open to all breeders of
pure lines or breeds. The National Pork Producers Council/National Pork Board
funded the meat quality evaluation for nine years and continues to fund gene
marker evaluation. There have been twelve tests conducted since 1991.
A sire group
consists of eight purebred progeny representing at least three litters. There
is no restriction on genetic relationship of dams. Pigs can be barrows or
gilts. Each progeny pig has a three generation pedigree from the appropriate
registry.
Pigs are entered
into a central test station on one day in late March or early April. Pig entry
weight is 10-30 kg. After at least seven days acclimation sire groups with
average weight of 32 kg or more are started on test. Leg soundness scores were
done by the University of Minnesota after pigs weighed 90 kg. Pigs were removed
from test only when the attending veterinarian and station manager agreed that
illness or injury had compromised a pig’s performance. Any pig removed from
growth evaluation was also excluded from other evaluations.
Pigs were
marketed weekly. Off test weight was 111 kg or more, resulting in an average
off test weight of 113 kg. All pigs were slaughtered at the Austin, MN Quality
Pork Processors plant. Carcass measurements were taken in the coolers twenty
four hours post mortem. Loin samples were taken to Iowa State University for
quality trait evaluation. Ham samples were taken to Texas A&M University
for composition and quality evaluation.
Distribution of pigs by
breed is shown in Table 1.
Table
1. NBS test pigs by breed.
|
Breed
|
Number test pigs
|
Number of sires
|
Number of dams
|
|
Berkshire
|
957
|
124
|
415
|
|
Chester
White
|
417
|
56
|
211
|
|
Duroc
|
805
|
110
|
407
|
|
Hampshire
|
443
|
62
|
224
|
|
Landrace
|
533
|
67
|
232
|
|
Poland
China
|
353
|
49
|
174
|
|
Spot
|
292
|
42
|
143
|
|
Yorkshire
|
858
|
119
|
423
|
|
Total
|
4658
|
629
|
2229
|
Genetic values
(EPD) of sires for growth, carcass, and meat quality have been calculated by
Iowa State University and provided to breeders. Growth trait evaluation results
by breed are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Growth traits by breed,
1991-2001. Least squares means and standard errors.
|
Breed
|
Average Daily Gain, g/d
|
Leg Structure,
1-5 score, 5=best
|
Leg Movement,
1-5 score, 5=best
|
|
Berkshire
|
791 ± 5.8 bc
|
3.2 ± 04 c
|
3.2 ± .03 e
|
|
Chester
White
|
778 ± 8.1 c
|
3.5 ± .05 a
|
3.6 ± .05 a
|
|
Duroc
|
817 ± 5.6 a
|
3.5 ± .04 a
|
3.5 ± .03 ab
|
|
Hampshire
|
756 ± 7.6 d
|
3.3 ± .05 b
|
3.3 ± .04 cd
|
|
Landrace
|
809 ± 7.3 ab
|
3.2 ± .04 c
|
3.2 ± .04 e
|
|
Poland
China
|
804 ± 8.1 ab
|
3.3 ± .05 bc
|
3.3 ± .04 de
|
|
Spot
|
778 ± 9.1 c
|
3.5 ± .05 ab
|
3.4 ± .05 cd
|
|
Yorkshire
|
802 ± 5.8 b
|
3.3 ± .04 b
|
3.5 ± .03 bc
|
Carcass trait evaluation
results by breed are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Carcass traits by breed,
1991-2001. Least squares means and standard errors.
|
Breed
|
LRBF, mm
|
BF10, mm
|
LMA, sq cm
|
Length, cm
|
|
Berkshire
|
30.4 ± .29 c
|
29.6 ± .37 d
|
35.1 ± .33 d
|
80.7 ± .12 d
|
|
Chester
White
|
30.2 ± .41 c
|
30.0 ± .51 d
|
36.4 ± .46 c
|
80.3 ± .17 d
|
|
Duroc
|
26.6 ± .30 a
|
23.5 ± .37 ab
|
39.1 ± .33 b
|
81.1 ± .12 c
|
|
Hampshire
|
27.7 ± .39 b
|
22.4 ± .49 a
|
42.2 ± .43 a
|
80.7 ± .16 d
|
|
Landrace
|
26.5 ± .36 a
|
24.4 ± .46 b
|
39.1 ± .41 b
|
82.9 ±.15 a
|
|
Poland
China
|
29.7 ± .40 c
|
28.5 ± .51 cd
|
36.3 ± .46 c
|
80.4 ± .17 d
|
|
Spot
|
29.9 ± .46 c
|
27.4 ± .58 c
|
37.3 ± .51 c
|
80.7 ± .19 d
|
|
Yorkshire
|
26.9 ± .30 ab
|
23.7 ± .37 b
|
39.2 ± .33 b
|
82.3 ± .12 b
|
Table 4. Fresh loin quality traits by breed, 1991-2001.
Least squares means and standard errors.
|
Breed
|
Minolta Y,
%
|
Color score,1-6
|
IMF, %
|
Marbling score,1-5
|
Ultimate pH
|
|
Berkshire
|
23.4 ± .22 a
|
3.17 ± .034 a
|
2.92 ± .056 b
|
2.74 ± .042 b
|
5.79 ± .010 a
|
|
Chester
White
|
24.4 ± .30 b
|
2.98 ± .046 b
|
2.78 ± .077 bc
|
2.69 ± .057 b
|
5.80 ± .013 a
|
|
Duroc
|
24.9 ± .23 b
|
2.90 ± .035 b
|
3.59 ± .057 a
|
2.92 ± .043 a
|
5.67 ± .010 b
|
|
Hampshire
|
23.5 ± .29 a
|
2.95 ± .044 b
|
2.19 ± .073 d
|
2.27 ± .054 c
|
5.51 ± .013 e
|
|
Landrace
|
28.2 ± .27 d
|
2.52 ± .041 d
|
2.13 ± .069 d
|
2.02 ± .051 e
|
5.57 ± .012 d
|
|
Poland
China
|
24.8 ± .30 b
|
2.93 ± .045 b
|
2.62 ± .077 c
|
2.41 ± .056 c
|
5.67 ± .013 b
|
|
Spot
|
25.8 ± .34 c
|
2.77 ± .051 c
|
2.66 ± .086 c
|
2.33 ± .064 c
|
5.62 ± .015 c
|
|
Yorkshire
|
25.9 ± .23 c
|
2.70 ± .034 c
|
2.06 ± .056 d
|
2.15 ± .042 d
|
5.61 ± .010 c
|
Table 5. Cooked loin traits by
breed, 1991-2001. Least squares means and standard errors.
|
Breed
|
Cooking loss, %
|
INSTRON, kg
|
Tenderness score, 1-10
|
Juiciness score, 1-10
|
|
Berkshire
|
21.2 ± .23 a
|
5.41 ± .052 a
|
7.18 ± .080 a
|
6.43 ± .074 a
|
|
Chester
White
|
22.4 ± .32 b
|
5.84 ± .072 b
|
6.51 ± .107 bc
|
6.15 ± .099 b
|
|
Duroc
|
23.3 ± .03 cd
|
5.95 ± .055 b
|
6.32 ± .083 cd
|
5.89 ± .077 c
|
|
Hampshire
|
25.1 ± .32 e
|
5.90 ± .072 b
|
6.71 ± .108 b
|
6.26 ± .100 ab
|
|
Landrace
|
23.9 ± .30 d
|
5.91 ± .069 b
|
6.32 ± .106 cd
|
5.51 ± .097 d
|
|
Poland
China
|
22.9 ± .31 bc
|
6.27 ± .072 c
|
6.02 ± .109 ef
|
5.71 ± .100 cd
|
|
Spot
|
23.8 ± .36 d
|
6.24 ± .082 c
|
5.88 ± .122 f
|
5.57 ± .113 d
|
|
Yorkshire
|
23.6 ± .24 cd
|
6.13 ± .055 c
|
6.23 ± .083 de
|
5.46 ± .078 d
|
Table 6. Ham composition
traits by breed, 1996-1997. Least squares means and standard errors.
|
|
Ham, kg
|
Ham lean, kg
|
Ham fat, kg
|
|
Berkshire
|
9.48 ± .058c
|
5.65 ± .054d
|
2.41 ± .040c
|
|
Chester White
|
9.89 ± .102ab
|
6.00 ± .096c
|
2.31 ± .072bc
|
|
Duroc
|
10.04 ± .084a
|
6.24 ± .076b
|
2.27 ± .057
|
|
Hampshire
|
10.05 ± .085a
|
6.35 ± .078b
|
2.18 ± .058b
|
|
Landrace
|
10.02 ± .073a
|
6.40 ±.066b
|
2.15 ± .050b
|
|
Poland China
|
9.81 ± .072b
|
5.69 ± .067d
|
2.65 ± .050d
|
|
Spot
|
9.75 ± .097b
|
5.62 ± .089d
|
2.66 ± .067d
|
|
Yorkshire
|
10.10 ± .069a
|
6.58 ± .064a
|
2.03 ± .048a
|
Table 7. Ham muscle
differences by breed, 1996-1997. Least squares means and standard errors.
|
|
Outside, kg
|
Inside, kg
|
Knuckle, kg
|
Bone, kg
|
|
Berkshire
|
1.73 ± .018d
|
1.25 ±.017e
|
0.97 ± .013d
|
1.01 ± .013c
|
|
Chester
White
|
1.70 ± .033d
|
1.46 ± .030c
|
0.99 ± .023cd
|
1.05 ± .025b
|
|
Duroc
|
1.92 ± .026b
|
1.46 ± .023c
|
1.03 ± .020bc
|
1.11 ± .018a
|
|
Hampshire
|
1.81 ± .027c
|
1.60 ± .024a
|
1.04 ± .020b
|
1.05 ± .019b
|
|
Landrace
|
1.89 ± .022b
|
1.57 ± .020ab
|
1.06 ± .017b
|
1.00 ± .015c
|
|
Poland
China
|
1.74 ± .023d
|
1.31 ± .021d
|
0.99 ± .017cd
|
1.10 ±
.016a
|
|
Spot
|
1.68 ± .030d
|
1.32 ± .028d
|
0.97 ± .023d
|
1.04 ± .022bc
|
|
Yorkshire
|
2.05 ± .022a
|
1.53 ±.021b
|
1.12 ± .016a
|
1.05 ± .016b
|
A tissue sample from each test pig has been frozen
and stored for future evaluation of gene effects. As gene tests become
available DNA will be extracted for evaluation. The variety of breeds and broad
sampling of breeds provides a unique resource for swine breeding research. The National Pork Board owns this
tissue-DNA-performance databank. Researchers can apply to the NPB Genetics
Program Committee for access to the database.